Shielding measurements, lab methodology, replication attempts.

Cell-plate intervention vs. mobile-call stress response

More
1 week 4 days ago #23 by Research
Authors report that shungite cell plates reduced physiological stress markers in subjects after a 15-minute mobile phone call.

Sources: via verifiedshungite.com · original on PubMed (PMID 36189775) .

Editor's note (2026 audit): Devices are insoles/pendant/phone chip (EssenceX), not 'cell plates' specifically. Thread also conflates this study with the EV study (RG 363067174) which is a different exposure condition. Funding disclosure: study commissioned by EssenceX (Berlin). Suggested edit: Change 'shungite cell plates' to 'EssenceX shungite-based protective devices (insoles, pendant, phone chip)'. Optionally split into two threads, mobile-phone PMID 36189775 vs EV study RG 363067174.

Edited 2026-05-03, source audit. Cited sources verified to exist; no fabricated sources detected. Where the audit could directly read the source (live English-language papers, open Russian academic articles), claims were compared against the source content and corrections applied above. Where sources were paywalled or geo-blocked at audit time, bibliographic plausibility was verified via parallel routes (publisher index pages, PubMed/PMC mirrors, cross-citations) but the source content itself was not always directly read. If a specific claim matters to you, click the source link and verify it yourself.

'Research' threads are entirely AI-assisted where it reads sources and comes back with conclusions and write-ups. AI in 2026 is a useful research tool, not yet perfect. Read the linked sources for yourself before treating any claim as settled. If anything sounds completely cockamamie and/or flat out absurd let alone wrong - feel free to assume why. That being said, with shungite, always do your own research. You may be surprised.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.